|
|
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 77: |
Line 77: |
|
| |
|
| [[User:Kimishima|Kimishima]] ([[User talk:Kimishima|talk]]) 10:51, 8 August 2018 (CEST) | | [[User:Kimishima|Kimishima]] ([[User talk:Kimishima|talk]]) 10:51, 8 August 2018 (CEST) |
|
| |
| == Category:Google (Publisher) deleted ==
| |
| Why did you delete this category? [[User:Flacs|Flacs]] ([[User talk:Flacs|talk]]) 21:50, 7 June 2020 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| Because it was empty and I was unaware of any product published by Google. Though looking at the [[YouTube Channel]] we fail to capture a dev / publisher there, where it may be appropriate. Even so, that may only populate the Google (Developer) category. It's weird cause we so inconsistently capture the dev / publisher info for channels, I believe likely due to it being difficult to determine for most of them, since info on the channels isn't tracked similarly to games on external sites. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 05:58, 8 June 2020 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| == Dualcore reporting ==
| |
| Small question, as of current whenever i find a dualcore issue i write it here and create a bug tracker issue for them. Considering that they are just duplicate issues of the whole dualcore problem, should i just mention them in my edits on the wiki, and not create issues on the bug tracker for them, or do both.
| |
|
| |
| : It's generally best to do both. Though for dual-core there is an issue on the bug tracker that all of them eventually get rolled into that can be referenced instead, {{Issue|7143}}. If a title is not already listed there you can probably just mention it in that issues comments rather than opening an extra issue. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 01:59, 21 June 2020 (CEST)
| |