19
edits
User talk:Kolano: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
nevermind
No edit summary |
(nevermind) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
[[User:Kimishima|Kimishima]] ([[User talk:Kimishima|talk]]) 10:51, 8 August 2018 (CEST) | [[User:Kimishima|Kimishima]] ([[User talk:Kimishima|talk]]) 10:51, 8 August 2018 (CEST) | ||
== Triforce rating == | |||
I see that you think that Triforce games should be rated 1 star because they are broken on master. While that is technically true, the same can be said about any other game not for Wii/GC. But just like any other console which is not Wii/GC, the master branch of Dolphin doesn't emulate the Triforce and because the wiki is inline with master I think they shouldn't be rated at all.[[User:Miksel12|Miksel12]] ([[User talk:Miksel12|talk]]) 13:51, 30 Dec 2020 (CEST) | |||
: This has already been discussed in the past, and is partially why the ratings for all those pages are locked. We understand it's been a long time since any progress has been made on Triforce emulation. The Triforce pages should probably be purged from the wiki, but folks have wanted to preserve them since Dolphin provides the only current path to emulate these titles, even if no longer supported on master. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 08:03, 31 December 2020 (CET) | |||
::I don't think the pages should be purged, like you said, Dolphin is the only way to emulate them. But by rating them against master, one would assume Triforce is emulated on master and it gives a wrong impression of which games are actually 'broken' (which are 5 games) and which games are from a machine not emulated (which are 15 games). So I would give the Triforce games 0 stars and keep the pages with a link to the Triforce branch.[[User:Miksel12|Miksel12]] ([[User talk:Miksel12|talk]]) 14:15, 31 Dec 2020 (CEST) | |||