|
|
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
| |
|
| == Open Discussions == | | == Open Discussions == |
|
| |
| === Emulation Information Position ===
| |
| Lucario, in his recent edits, put the Emulation Information section above problems, while I have historically put them below. It is something of a subjective decision, but most of the time the problems are minor, and not as critical as emulation bugs, so historically, by our conventions, they have been placed below other problems. So I assumed based on that that the Emulation Information would be placed beneath problems, and sometimes they were, and other times they weren't depending on who entered it. I was going to just move it all, but this could cause issues in the future, so we should probably get some consensus established. What location for the emulation information do you guys prefer? - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 10:46, 17 November 2015 (CET)
| |
| : As far as I remember, we sticked with Emulation Information above problems but I'm not sure either (would have to dig into that long discussions -- too lazy to do that now). So, I think we should put it above. Yes, they're minor, but it's also some very common problems, thus, it's what the user wold read first if they have issues with a bad dump (SSBB case), problems with widescreen hack (GC games with native support) or controller issues (Wii games), providing information quicker instead of rolling through the entire problems section, that can take a big amount of space (e.g. Wind Waker, which have lots of problems listed). And since emulation information isn't a section that's going to be crowded (so far I haven't saw any page with more than two small entries) I think it's a win-win case (the full page would be something like Emu Info => Global Problems => Problems => Enhancements => Config => Version Compat => Testing => Gameplay Screens => Gameplay Videos => Navigation -- Emu Info and Enhancements only present in pages that have suitable entries, Global Problems only in VC pages and Navigation only where applicable). - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]])
| |
|
| |
| :It's position doesn't bother me one way or the other. To hopefully build consensus I'll say list them first. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 15:40, 17 November 2015 (CET)
| |
|
| |
| ::Well, I don't entirely agree, but you have reasonable thought behind it, and Kolano got me :P. The top it is! - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 11:32, 18 November 2015 (CET)
| |
|
| |
|
| === [[Project:General Discussions/Archive]]? === | | === [[Project:General Discussions/Archive]]? === |
