6,576
edits
Template talk:VersionCompatibilityVersion/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Template talk:VersionCompatibilityVersion/sandbox (view source)
Revision as of 19:54, 4 January 2016
, 4 January 2016→Finished!
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:Your new ideas sound good too. You can edit this template and see how it goes. I'm satisfied with this new template though more features are welcomed. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 16:45, 3 January 2016 (CET) | :Your new ideas sound good too. You can edit this template and see how it goes. I'm satisfied with this new template though more features are welcomed. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 16:45, 3 January 2016 (CET) | ||
:kolano, after seeing the semi-transparent white background in effect I'd actually prefer the illegible text again. Maybe you could revise it to make the white background thinner, blurrier, and don't apply behind the black arrow? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 18:53, 4 January 2016 (CET) | |||
:I'm not entirely sure how much of a good idea this is... we get a lot of "I tried it and it was good!" things which did not change the rating or have anything notable in them, which do not belong on the version compatibility graph. By the definition of "where compatibility change occured", if we strictly followed our own rules this is almost never an issue. The only times I can think of where it would genuinely be useful is cases like, a bug occurs and it is fixed rapidly. But the wiki often misses those anyway. :P But anyway, we shouldn't change anything until clear improvements are established, and I'm not really seeing them right now. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (CET) | :I'm not entirely sure how much of a good idea this is... we get a lot of "I tried it and it was good!" things which did not change the rating or have anything notable in them, which do not belong on the version compatibility graph. By the definition of "where compatibility change occured", if we strictly followed our own rules this is almost never an issue. The only times I can think of where it would genuinely be useful is cases like, a bug occurs and it is fixed rapidly. But the wiki often misses those anyway. :P But anyway, we shouldn't change anything until clear improvements are established, and I'm not really seeing them right now. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (CET) | ||
::As of right now the styling isn't really good, such as a wasted space above and few other ugly styling layouts. They will be ironed out eventually. By the way, there is overlap problem like this [[Star Wars Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader]] that this new bar may be better for that. Let's also take narrowed browsers into consideration, where the revision labels will be overlapped even more in there. I'm hoping to implement this hover popup (like http://www.wickham43.net/hoverpopups.php) which works for Safari on iOS. Currently I and other iOS users cannot view notes or revision number of the overlapped revision. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 18:53, 4 January 2016 (CET) | |||