Template talk:Gecko: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 69: Line 69:
Maybe we should make our own really basic copy of the Pre template? It seems like it would be nicer to work/more readable than the weird includeonlys inside pres randomly on the page, and the ability to have markup in pre tags could come up again. I don't see a reason why not. (Did a minor edit on accident, oops....) - [[User:Xerxes|Xerxes]] ([[User talk:Xerxes|talk]]) 14:08, 6 January 2018 (CET)
Maybe we should make our own really basic copy of the Pre template? It seems like it would be nicer to work/more readable than the weird includeonlys inside pres randomly on the page, and the ability to have markup in pre tags could come up again. I don't see a reason why not. (Did a minor edit on accident, oops....) - [[User:Xerxes|Xerxes]] ([[User talk:Xerxes|talk]]) 14:08, 6 January 2018 (CET)
:Gecko template really need a way to display output in pre tags. I can't think of any other use-cases that need this, but preferably not, I can see this becoming rival against Gecko template. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 01:15, 7 January 2018 (CET)
:Gecko template really need a way to display output in pre tags. I can't think of any other use-cases that need this, but preferably not, I can see this becoming rival against Gecko template. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 01:15, 7 January 2018 (CET)
::It screws up the documentation on the page though by consuming the includeonly tags, leaving that empty code box at the top of the page. I don't see how a workaround template here would compete with the gecko template, we already have a few smaller templates for stuff like this like [[Template:Hover]], so there's precedent. - [[User:Xerxes|Xerxes]] ([[User talk:Xerxes|talk]]) 09:31, 8 January 2018 (CET)


== Widescreen ==
== Widescreen ==
6,906

edits

Navigation menu