Template talk:Problems/GC Widescreen Auto: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
DPL discussion moved to a talk page for extension
(DPL discussion moved to a talk page for extension)
Line 1: Line 1:
== DLP Problem ==
So I had been trying out the new DLP extension here to pull in a list of pages using this template. Something seems to be going wrong though as it lists things like "Ice Age 2: The Meltdown", which is just a disambig page. Though it seemed simple enough, maybe my syntax is off somehow. It's strange in any case. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 22:24, 23 November 2015 (CET)
:I was able to add some additional rules to filter out the {{tl|disambig}} and Wii titles pulled in through {{tl|disambig}}. Still need to work out how to prevent the tracing through {{tl|disambig}}, since other page lists may not be able to as simply filter those pages out (i.e. any that includes both GC and Wii titles). [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 08:36, 28 November 2015 (CET)
== Template split ==
== Template split ==
Hadn't time to look into detail before but *why* this template got splitted into two? From the recent discussions it seems that for some games (like King Arthur) the built-in AR switch doesn't work, I got it, but why not edit template logic to conditionally change the text from "Auto" to "Force" if an additional parameter is given? That's waay cleaner than creating an almost identical duplicate to handle this (it's what {{tl|config}} and {{tl|testing}} does to handle channels, for example). I'm completely against having this template split when an super simple addition would achieve the same, I almost reverted it without asking but I think you may have a good reason to do so? - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 05:08, 24 November 2015 (CET)
Hadn't time to look into detail before but *why* this template got splitted into two? From the recent discussions it seems that for some games (like King Arthur) the built-in AR switch doesn't work, I got it, but why not edit template logic to conditionally change the text from "Auto" to "Force" if an additional parameter is given? That's waay cleaner than creating an almost identical duplicate to handle this (it's what {{tl|config}} and {{tl|testing}} does to handle channels, for example). I'm completely against having this template split when an super simple addition would achieve the same, I almost reverted it without asking but I think you may have a good reason to do so? - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 05:08, 24 November 2015 (CET)

Navigation menu