79,225
edits
Template talk:Ratings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Perfect vs Excellent
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
:::: We would have to update the compatibility rating in all affected games back and forward each time a global problem is found then fixed. I don't think that's easy task. I must make an exception for significant global problems like ones in VC titles though. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 08:38, 7 December 2015 (CET) | :::: We would have to update the compatibility rating in all affected games back and forward each time a global problem is found then fixed. I don't think that's easy task. I must make an exception for significant global problems like ones in VC titles though. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 08:38, 7 December 2015 (CET) | ||
::::: Yes, we would. I'd need to look through again but I think the current places we have violators are likely due to the global problem only effecting the PAL versions of things. That's a seperate thing we need to discuss, I'll add a topic below. | |||
== Regions and Ratings == | |||
We currently have a few NES titles rated as 5 star, even though they have an open Global Problem. I think we've allowed that as the issue only effects PAL titles, but I'm not really sure. In any case, how should compatibility differences across regions effect ratings? I'd lean toward lowest compatibility winning out, but that doesn't seem to be the tact we've taken thus far. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 08:59, 7 December 2015 (CET) | |||