6,576
edits
Template talk:Ratings: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Regions and Ratings
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
We currently have a few NES titles rated as 5 star, even though they have an open Global Problem. I think we've allowed that as the issue only effects PAL titles, but I'm not really sure. In any case, how should compatibility differences across regions effect ratings? I'd lean toward lowest compatibility winning out, but that doesn't seem to be the tact we've taken thus far. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 08:59, 7 December 2015 (CET) | We currently have a few NES titles rated as 5 star, even though they have an open Global Problem. I think we've allowed that as the issue only effects PAL titles, but I'm not really sure. In any case, how should compatibility differences across regions effect ratings? I'd lean toward lowest compatibility winning out, but that doesn't seem to be the tact we've taken thus far. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 08:59, 7 December 2015 (CET) | ||
:The non-English material may be receiving too much credit for this English-centric website if it's under the spotlight over the English edition material. Wikipedia has similar rule for the cover art from different regions here: [[wikipedia:wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Article_guidelines#Cover_art]]. But I have this kind of mindset that there should be zero problem in the problem section to qualify 5 stars so I'm very | :The non-English material may be receiving too much credit for this English-centric website if it's under the spotlight over the English edition material. Wikipedia has similar rule for the cover art from different regions here: [[wikipedia:wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Article_guidelines#Cover_art]]. But I have this kind of mindset that there should be zero problem in the problem section to qualify 5 stars so I'm very unsure which one is right. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 10:22, 7 December 2015 (CET) | ||