Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
::::::You've got nice idea with naming beneath each set of stars. It'll be very clear to the users what they're supposed to rate the game as! I'd also like to throw mine for 3D condition rating stars: Excellent, Okay, and Eyesore. Is the last one too funny? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 10:38, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ::::::You've got nice idea with naming beneath each set of stars. It'll be very clear to the users what they're supposed to rate the game as! I'd also like to throw mine for 3D condition rating stars: Excellent, Okay, and Eyesore. Is the last one too funny? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 10:38, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ||
:::::::Those two ideas are at [[Template talk:Infobox VG]] and [[Template talk:Ratings]]. I hope you don't mind that Kolano, but it seemed silly to have it ALL here, even ideas that apply to everything. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 11:26, 29 November 2015 (CET) | :::::::Those two ideas are at [[Template talk:Infobox VG]] and [[Template talk:Ratings]]. I hope you don't mind that Kolano, but it seemed silly to have it ALL here, even ideas that apply to everything. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 11:26, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ||
:::::::I would replace that "Eyesore" with "Not Recommended", it's a bit more ample, we could tag 2D only titles here as well... - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 18:27, 29 November 2015 (CET) | |||