467
edits
Template talk:Problems/VP6 Videos: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Change VP6 description
| (10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
There is a test claiming this title is also effected: | There is a test claiming this title is also effected: | ||
*[[de Blob 2]] | *[[de Blob 2]]: But on examination it's not. Though there may be some other issue there where a rectangular section of the first intro video flickers. It's unlike the lines seen with VP6 videos. | ||
== Change VP6 description == | |||
The current stable version is 5.0. Should the comparison between the prior 4.0-593 and the after 4.0-593 versions be purged as a result? I mean at least I think so. [[User:Kimishima|Kimishima]] ([[User talk:Kimishima|talk]]) 14:04, 1 August 2018 (CEST) | |||
: No, that's still historically where the change occured, even if it was a while ago. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 05:09, 2 August 2018 (CEST) | |||
::Well, yeah, but why not only let the version compatibility chart have it instead? Seeing that we regularly purge out all the old problems pre-5.0 and not there. You could argue that the purging thing is for the slashed entries, why not we go as far as to rewrite the entries of ongoing problems to keep up with our desire to purge out the pre-5.0 problems? They'll still be available in version compatibility chart. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:30, 2 August 2018 (CEST) | |||
::: We aren't purging out pre-5.0 issues and have no desire to do so. We purge out issues resolved prior to 5.0. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 07:52, 2 August 2018 (CEST) | |||
::::Sorry, I meant those problems resolved before 5.0. I did said "old problems pre-5.0" but I guess that wasn't clear, then I went on just saying "pre-5.0 problems" afterwards so I understand the confusion here. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 08:07, 2 August 2018 (CEST) | |||
::::: "We aren't purging out pre-5.0 issues and have no desire to do so. We purge out issues resolved prior to 5.0. "([[User:Kolano|Kolano]]) That's true. Don't we change the descriptions to fit the latest stable version? From something like: '''This issue was first noticed in <nowiki>{{revision|4.0-1234}}</nowiki>. Refer <nowiki>{{issue|7294}}</nowiki>.''' to '''Refer <nowiki>{{issue|7294}}</nowiki>.'''? And don't we delete things like '''This issue got less worse in <nowiki>{{revision|4.0-5678}}</nowiki>'''? [[User:Kimishima|Kimishima]] ([[User talk:Kimishima|talk]]) 11:45, 2 August 2018 (CEST) | |||
:::::: Generally no, details on the specific breaking / revising versions can be important to getting issues resolved. We do generally prefer to avoid verbiage specifying the use of specific versions however, unless the related issue is actually only resolved on some particular release, since typically use of the newest release is for the best. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 21:13, 2 August 2018 (CEST) | |||
::::::: Okay [[User:Kimishima|Kimishima]] ([[User talk:Kimishima|talk]]) 23:14, 2 August 2018 (CEST) | |||