5,502
edits
 |
Progress Continues
We've already had 21543 updates since Dolphin 5.0. Keep up with Dolphin's continuing progress through the Dolphin Blog: February, March, and April 2024 Dolphin Progress Report. |
 |
The Dolphin Emulator Wiki needs your help! Dolphin can play thousands of games, and changes are happening all the time. Help us keep up! Join in and help us make this the best resource for Dolphin. |
Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Talk:Stereoscopic 3D Compatibility Guide (view source)
Revision as of 12:24, 29 November 2015
, 29 November 2015→Improvements?
No edit summary |
m (→Improvements?) |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
:::[[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 05:56, 29 November 2015 (CET) | :::[[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 05:56, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ||
::::In case you didn't know, I was replying to MaJoR. Unless you just want to chime in about my comment. The rating system for 3D is only made of 3 stars and should be simple enough than five stars the compatibility rating been having. They're also hued to green to appear different from rating stars for compatibility. Can they not get along well in the Info VG? I'm not sure we'd need the recommended convergence/depth setting here because I think there are PR's and GameINI that will provide preset 3D per game for all 3D users. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 08:46, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ::::In case you didn't know, I was replying to MaJoR. Unless you just want to chime in about my comment. The rating system for 3D is only made of 3 stars and should be simple enough than five stars the compatibility rating been having. They're also hued to green to appear different from rating stars for compatibility. Can they not get along well in the Info VG? I'm not sure we'd need the recommended convergence/depth setting here because I think there are PR's and GameINI that will provide preset 3D per game for all 3D users. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 08:46, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ||
:::::You should have used two colons instead of three, technically you replied to kolano! :P | :::::You should have used two colons instead of three, technically you replied to kolano! :P Anyway, I'm not against a rating system per se, if we can come up with a good way to communicate it and something users can understand, that's alright. We just need to be very careful to avoid the mess that has happened to the main rating system. Here's a thought... beneath the rating stars, why don't we show the name of the rating! Seriously, we should do this for the main rating as well. I'll go bring it up on the talk page over there. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 10:05, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ||
::::::You've got nice idea with naming beneath each set of stars. It'll be very clear to the users what they're supposed to rate the game as! I'd also like to throw mine for 3D condition rating stars: Excellent, Okay, and Eyesore. Is the last one too funny? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 10:38, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ::::::You've got nice idea with naming beneath each set of stars. It'll be very clear to the users what they're supposed to rate the game as! I'd also like to throw mine for 3D condition rating stars: Excellent, Okay, and Eyesore. Is the last one too funny? [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 10:38, 29 November 2015 (CET) | ||