79,225
edits
Template talk:Compatibility: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I don't really like this either. This is the wrong direction for us. There is no such thing as perfect, as PCSX2 showed just how easily you can call ANYTHING perfect and get away with it. We should be reducing emphasis on this "perfection", not adding more. And I don't want to highlight perfect ratings in the compatibility list either, because they could very easily be tested and reveal new bugs, which is a bad experience for users. As I've said before, perfection right now on this wiki is "no currently known problems during testing". No testing or a non-critical eye in an uncommon game are all it takes for terrible bugs to be in a "perfect" game. And that's most of the wiki's 5 star games. We absolutely should NOT be emphasizing this subjective and buggy system, we should be paring it down to be more realistic! - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 07:08, 2 December 2015 (CET) | I don't really like this either. This is the wrong direction for us. There is no such thing as perfect, as PCSX2 showed just how easily you can call ANYTHING perfect and get away with it. We should be reducing emphasis on this "perfection", not adding more. And I don't want to highlight perfect ratings in the compatibility list either, because they could very easily be tested and reveal new bugs, which is a bad experience for users. As I've said before, perfection right now on this wiki is "no currently known problems during testing". No testing or a non-critical eye in an uncommon game are all it takes for terrible bugs to be in a "perfect" game. And that's most of the wiki's 5 star games. We absolutely should NOT be emphasizing this subjective and buggy system, we should be paring it down to be more realistic! - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 07:08, 2 December 2015 (CET) | ||
:I was just asking if it's OK to turn the 4 stars and less to sky blue and the 5 stars staying yellow, I wasn't taking "perfect" or other terms to define 5 stars into mind. I don't think I mention "Perfect" here until now >_>. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:22, 2 December 2015 (CET) | :I was just asking if it's OK to turn the 4 stars and less to sky blue and the 5 stars staying yellow, I wasn't taking "perfect" or other terms to define 5 stars into mind. I don't think I mention "Perfect" here until now >_>. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:22, 2 December 2015 (CET) | ||
::Right, but the only reason to change the colors of the non-perfect ratings would be to highlight the perfect ones. Unless you can provide some other reason to do this | ::Right, but the only reason to change the colors of the non-perfect ratings would be to highlight the perfect ones. Unless you can provide some other reason to do this. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 07:42, 2 December 2015 (CET) | ||