Template talk:Compatibility: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Username rename (MaJoR => MayImilae)
(Username rename (Jhonn => mbc07))
(Username rename (MaJoR => MayImilae))
Line 13: Line 13:
::No, but this suggestion would mean that there would need to be 2 colors of stars per rating, so 4 colors /w 2 ratings, 6 colors /w 3; that quickly becomes difficult to work out particularly if you also want things to comply with color blindness tests. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 07:46, 2 December 2015 (CET)
::No, but this suggestion would mean that there would need to be 2 colors of stars per rating, so 4 colors /w 2 ratings, 6 colors /w 3; that quickly becomes difficult to work out particularly if you also want things to comply with color blindness tests. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 07:46, 2 December 2015 (CET)
:::Not sure how is it necessary to have diff rating set to have two colors just like compatibility rating system. If they had to, perhaps the complete set of stars, be there only 3 for example, will receive the same golden color as the compatibility rating stars. I don't mind that. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 08:01, 2 December 2015 (CET)
:::Not sure how is it necessary to have diff rating set to have two colors just like compatibility rating system. If they had to, perhaps the complete set of stars, be there only 3 for example, will receive the same golden color as the compatibility rating stars. I don't mind that. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 08:01, 2 December 2015 (CET)
I don't really like this either. This is the wrong direction for us. There is no such thing as perfect, as PCSX2 showed just how easily you can call ANYTHING perfect and get away with it. We should be reducing emphasis on this "perfection", not adding more. And I don't want to highlight perfect ratings in the compatibility list either, because they could very easily be tested and reveal new bugs, which is a bad experience for users. As I've said before, perfection right now on this wiki is "no currently known problems during testing". No testing or a non-critical eye in an uncommon game are all it takes for terrible bugs to be in a "perfect" game. And that's most of the wiki's 5 star games. We absolutely should NOT be emphasizing this subjective and buggy system, we should be paring it down to be more realistic! - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 07:08, 2 December 2015 (CET)
I don't really like this either. This is the wrong direction for us. There is no such thing as perfect, as PCSX2 showed just how easily you can call ANYTHING perfect and get away with it. We should be reducing emphasis on this "perfection", not adding more. And I don't want to highlight perfect ratings in the compatibility list either, because they could very easily be tested and reveal new bugs, which is a bad experience for users. As I've said before, perfection right now on this wiki is "no currently known problems during testing". No testing or a non-critical eye in an uncommon game are all it takes for terrible bugs to be in a "perfect" game. And that's most of the wiki's 5 star games. We absolutely should NOT be emphasizing this subjective and buggy system, we should be paring it down to be more realistic! - [[User:MayImilae|MayImilae]] ([[User talk:MayImilae|talk]]) 07:08, 2 December 2015 (CET)
:I was just asking if it's OK to turn the 4 stars and less to sky blue and the 5 stars staying yellow, I wasn't taking "perfect" or other terms to define 5 stars into mind. I don't think I mention "Perfect" here until now >_>. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:22, 2 December 2015 (CET)
:I was just asking if it's OK to turn the 4 stars and less to sky blue and the 5 stars staying yellow, I wasn't taking "perfect" or other terms to define 5 stars into mind. I don't think I mention "Perfect" here until now >_>. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:22, 2 December 2015 (CET)
::Right, but the only reason to change the colors of the non-perfect ratings would be to highlight the perfect ones. Unless you can provide some other reason to do this. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 07:42, 2 December 2015 (CET)
::Right, but the only reason to change the colors of the non-perfect ratings would be to highlight the perfect ones. Unless you can provide some other reason to do this. [[User:Kolano|Kolano]] ([[User talk:Kolano|talk]]) 07:42, 2 December 2015 (CET)

Navigation menu