Template talk:Ratings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 98: Line 98:


::I've came up with a better description just today. It's "No reported issues". It sounds more accurate and honest. Far more appropriate for the games that haven't been played or tested much yet. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:30, 11 December 2015 (CET)
::I've came up with a better description just today. It's "No reported issues". It sounds more accurate and honest. Far more appropriate for the games that haven't been played or tested much yet. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 07:30, 11 December 2015 (CET)
:::There are global issues, so that's '''''worse!''''' Issues have been reported, we're just choosing that they are not relevant. No relevant issues is the most honest option so far. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 13:36, 11 December 2015 (CET)


So, conclusions? I read the new "no relevant issues" proposal and meh, looks like we're exchanging "six" for "half a dozen", essentially not changing anything. Considering Dolphin is an emulator of a complex console, unless some day it becomes an accuracy focused emulator (like higan), calling the top-most rating as Perfect doesn't look completely right to me. In other words, my vote goes now to Excellent as well - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 20:27, 10 December 2015 (CET)
So, conclusions? I read the new "no relevant issues" proposal and meh, looks like we're exchanging "six" for "half a dozen", essentially not changing anything. Considering Dolphin is an emulator of a complex console, unless some day it becomes an accuracy focused emulator (like higan), calling the top-most rating as Perfect doesn't look completely right to me. In other words, my vote goes now to Excellent as well - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 20:27, 10 December 2015 (CET)


:At least "No relevant issues" is better than saying "No issues at all!". The latter one sounds misleading and childish so I'm in for this change, whether it's simply a placeholder for the upcoming better description. Have any idea how to write description for "Excellent" also? I'm ok for either but may blur the bar between "perfect" and "playable" and that's something we're afraid of. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 00:28, 11 December 2015 (CET)
:At least "No relevant issues" is better than saying "No issues at all!". The latter one sounds misleading and childish so I'm in for this change, whether it's simply a placeholder for the upcoming better description. Have any idea how to write description for "Excellent" also? I'm ok for either but may blur the bar between "perfect" and "playable" and that's something we're afraid of. [[User:Lucario|Lucario]] ([[User talk:Lucario|talk]]) 00:28, 11 December 2015 (CET)
::I think Excellent: No relevant issues" is fine. Unless someone has a better idea. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 13:36, 11 December 2015 (CET)


== Regions and Ratings ==
== Regions and Ratings ==

Navigation menu