Template talk:Ratings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 100: Line 100:


:::There are global issues, so that's '''''worse!''''' Issues have been reported, we're just choosing that they are not relevant. No relevant issues is the most honest option so far. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 13:36, 11 December 2015 (CET)
:::There are global issues, so that's '''''worse!''''' Issues have been reported, we're just choosing that they are not relevant. No relevant issues is the most honest option so far. - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 13:36, 11 December 2015 (CET)
::For the record, I think Excellent is better. I'm just kind of tired of endless bikeshedding over silly things, so I don't want to go into huge long battles over this. If this tiny change to the perfect definition is all you guys will accept, it's better than nothing...  - [[User:MaJoR|MaJoR]] ([[User talk:MaJoR|talk]]) 13:41, 11 December 2015 (CET)


So, conclusions? I read the new "no relevant issues" proposal and meh, looks like we're exchanging "six" for "half a dozen", essentially not changing anything. Considering Dolphin is an emulator of a complex console, unless some day it becomes an accuracy focused emulator (like higan), calling the top-most rating as Perfect doesn't look completely right to me. In other words, my vote goes now to Excellent as well - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 20:27, 10 December 2015 (CET)
So, conclusions? I read the new "no relevant issues" proposal and meh, looks like we're exchanging "six" for "half a dozen", essentially not changing anything. Considering Dolphin is an emulator of a complex console, unless some day it becomes an accuracy focused emulator (like higan), calling the top-most rating as Perfect doesn't look completely right to me. In other words, my vote goes now to Excellent as well - [[User:Jhonn|Jhonn]] ([[User talk:Jhonn|talk]]) 20:27, 10 December 2015 (CET)

Navigation menu